Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Dayton Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1916No. 12. [fn*]Published

Appeal from District Court, Liberty County; J. Llewellyn, Judge. Action by M. D. Maddox and others against the Dayton Lumber Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtConley, C. J.

This was a suit by Mrs. M. D. Maddox, as plaintiff, Mrs. Mary E. McDonald, executrix of the estate of R. McDonald, deceased, as intervener, and the defendant Arch McDonald, against the Dayton Lumber Company, Mrs. Kate Brashear, James E. Ferguson, Julian Kelton, Genevieve Kelton, Mary White, and her husband, W. B. White, to recover title and possession to, and remove cloud from, the title to 1,778.7 acres of land described as Shattuc surveys 62, 63, and 64 in Liberty county, Tex.; and also to establish the true boundary lines existing between the said Shattuc surveys and the Martinez leagues 6…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stroud v. SpringfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Linney v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. State of Texas v. Dayton Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Russell v. HunnicuttTexas Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API