Legal Opinion
McAvoy v. Schramme
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The provision of the contract that payment to the attorney shall be made in cash, though the property received by the client may be something other than cash, is inconsistent with an intention to make an equitable assignment.
The judgment should be affirmed with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
2Cited by5 opinions
- McAvoy v. SchrammeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re Acquiring Title by the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Cleary v. FoggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- In re the Estate of KienleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Thom v. LevinNew York Supreme Court · 1958