Legal Opinion

Cleary v. Fogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

This action was commenced in equity by plaintiff, an attorney, to recover compensation for services rendered. The defendant Fogg is designated as the real party in interest, whereas, according to respondent, the Roosevelt Hotel, Inc., is the “ stakeholder ” of “ the fund and the security out of which, and only out of which, the attorney’s fee is payable under a partly oral and partly written agreement between the attorney and the client.” It would serve no useful purpose to recite in detail the several allegations which are contained in the voluminous complaint which covers twenty-three pages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Hinkle Iron Co. v. . KohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Holmes v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Lowery v. . StewardNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KienleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API