Legal Opinion
McNulty v. Travel Park
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 5, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-CV-1186PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
We are here presented with a rather unusual motion in that the plaintiffs are asking this court to dismiss their case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and to permit them to transfer this action to Pennsylvania state court. The defendants, in turn, oppose the plaintiffs’ request and have filed a cross-motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 11. For the reasons which follow, both motions are denied.
I. HISTORY OF THE' CASE.
This civil action has its origins in an incident which occurred on July 25, 1992 when the husband-plaintiff was struck…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adolph Coors Company v. Movement Against Racism and the KlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Robert Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Helen W. ANGUS, Appellant, v. SHILEY INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vives v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- KOVALEV v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022