Legal Opinion

McPhail v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided June 4, 1997No. Civ.A. 96-0119-RV-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VOLLMER, District Judge.

Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 37) on all counts. Defendants have submitted a brief (Doc. 38) and evidence in the form of affidavits, expert reports, and deposition excerpts (attachments to Doc. 37) in support of their motion. Plaintiff filed a brief and evidentiary submissions in response to the motion (Doc. 45). Thereafter, defendants submitted a reply brief (Doc. 49) to which plaintiff replied in kind (Doc. 52). Also before the court is plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 39) 1 with supporting brief…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Mikele S. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Jose Garcia-Pendrosa, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Morisky v. Broward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Amtrak "Sunset Ltd." Train Crash in Bayou CanotDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2000
  2. McClain v. Metabolife International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API