McPhail v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VOLLMER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 37) on all counts. Defendants have submitted a brief (Doc. 38) and evidence in the form of affidavits, expert reports, and deposition excerpts (attachments to Doc. 37) in support of their motion. Plaintiff filed a brief and evidentiary submissions in response to the motion (Doc. 45). Thereafter, defendants submitted a reply brief (Doc. 49) to which plaintiff replied in kind (Doc. 52). Also before the court is plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 39) 1 with supporting brief…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Mikele S. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Jose Garcia-Pendrosa, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Morisky v. Broward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Amtrak "Sunset Ltd." Train Crash in Bayou CanotDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2000
- McClain v. Metabolife International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002