Legal Opinion
Grassi v. Kamalian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals on the ground of inadequacy from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Barone, J.), dated July 14, 1994, which is in his favor and against the defendants in the principal sum of only $70,000 for past pain and suffering.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff contends that the jury’s failure to award him damages for future pain and suffering is inconsistent with its award of damages for past pain and suffering. This issue was not raised before the trial court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- O'Boyle v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Casey v. SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Strauss v. HuberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Duran v. HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McEwen v. Akron Fire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Clements v. LindseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Doubrovinskaya v. DembitzerNew York Supreme Court · 2008