Legal Opinion
Cherry v. Howell
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 31, 1931No. 4638PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the defendant Clark Howell, the only defendant served, for an order dismissing the complaint herein, upon the ground, that said complaint does not state facts, sufficient to constitute a cause of action. .
The action is stated to be brought by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and of all others similarly situated who shall come in as parties plaintiff and contribute to the expense of the suit.
The subject of the aetion is the affairs of the Southern Guarantee Loan Company, a Georgia investment corporation now in the hands of receivers.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Dykman v. . KeeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Howland v. CornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Spetler v. Jogel Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Bouton v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Speed v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
- Cherry v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Brusselback v. Cago Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Todd v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939