Legal Opinion

Kinealy v. Macklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Hurck v. Erskine, 50 Mo. 119, 2d par.; State v. Newkirk, 49 Mo. 472; Gale v. Grimes, 9 Ind. 143; Carney v. Emmons et al., 9 Wis. 118 ; Beebe w.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Hurck v. Erskine, 50 Mo. 119, 2d par.; State v. Newkirk, 49 Mo. 472; Gale v. Grimes, 9 Ind. 143; Carney v. Emmons et al., 9 Wis. 118 ; Beebe w. Bank of New York, 1 Johns. 529; Byland v. Callison, 54 Mo. 514; Herrington v. Hei-rington, 27 Mo. 560; Pepper v. Carter, 11 Mo. 540; Eddy v. Baldwin, 23'Mo. 588; Allen v. Berry., 50.Mo. 90; Ames v. Gilmore, 59 Mo. 538 (syllabus), 5.50; Howe v. Colby, 19 Wis. 583. cited: Hurck v. Erskine, 50 Mo. 119 ; McKey v. Underwood, 47 Mo. 187.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This action is brought by appellant, as purchaser at an execution sale, to set aside a conveyance of the property purchased, made by defendant Patrick Macklin, the execution debtor, to Francis L. Haydell, as trustee for the sole and separate use of defendant Ann Macklin, the wife of defendant Patrick Macklin.

The petitioner alleges that William B. Ferguson obtained judgment against defendant Patrick Macklin on a promissory note of which he was maker ; execution was levied on certain real estate owned by Patrick Macklin, part of which was purchased, at the sale under the execution, by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnk v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. North v. StevensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Kinealy v. BoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API