Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ware

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1903No. 13,171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge-

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in error prosecute this proceeding to reverse an order of the district court refusing to grant them a new trial, upon a judgment rendered against them by default upon a cross-petition foreclosing two mortgage liens upon their property. The petitioners filed what appears to be a defense to the allegations of the cross-petition.

The defendant in error moves to dismiss this proceeding for the reason that all of the parties defendant in the court below who might be affected by a reversal of the judgment were not served with the case-made or with summons in error. The defendant in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buell v. EmerichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vail v. School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Herman v. GardenerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API