Legal Opinion

Bryant v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 9, 2004No. Nos. 2003-C-3491, 2004-C-0028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

|! KIMBALL, Justice.

These consolidated cases involve the narrow issue of whether La. R.S. 32:866, the “no pay, no play” law, applies to bar a portion of a named insured’s recovery of her own bodily injury and/or property damages when an excluded driver is involved in an accident while driving the named insured’s, vehicle. For the reasons that follow, we find that when an insurance policy affords no coverage when an excluded driver is operating a named insured’s vehicle, policy considerations dictate a conclusion that La. R.S. 32:866 applies to bar a portion of the named insured’s recovery…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O.K. Realty Co. v. John A. Juliani, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Marcus v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryant v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API