Legal Opinion

Walkersville v. 103-29 Limited Partnership

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 31, 1998No. 1624, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SONNER, Judge.

Appellants/cross-appellees, the Burgess 1 and Commissioners of Walkersville (the Commissioners), challenge an order issued in the Circuit Court for Frederick County entering a judgment in favor of appellee/cross-appellant, 103-29 Limited Partnership (the landowner). The Commissioners filed this appeal and the landowner has cross-appealed. We are asked to consider the following questions:

I. Did the court err in finding that the Burgess and the Commissioners acted arbitrarily in adopting boundaries for a neighborhood different from those presented at the hearing?

II. Did the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Woodlawn Area Citizens Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. County Council of Prince George's County v. Brandywine Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Clayman v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Lucas v. People's Counsel for Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Powell v. Calvert CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Arking v. Montgomery County Planning BoardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API