Legal Opinion

Hollister v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1901No. Nos. 12,674—(36)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Cant, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This was an action to recover upon a bond executed by defendant as surety. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds (1) that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) that it appears on the face thereof that there is a defect of parties defendant. The demurrer was overruled by the court below, and defendant appealed.

It is alleged in the complaint that on May 12, 1898, judgment was rendered in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota in an action pending therein between one Doyle, as plaintiff, and W. E. McCord and McCord…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holden v. Great Western Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fryklund v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. ScheiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Schmidt v. Agricultural Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Minneapolis Plumbing Co. v. Arcade Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Morgan v. BrachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API