Legal Opinion
R.H. MacY & Co. v. Williams Tile & Terrazzo Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. A. C79-1998APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
HORACE T. WARD, District Judge.
This action arose out of a series of events involving the renovation of the Dav-ison’s Lenox store. The case specifically concerns the selection and installation of defective ceramic tile. Copeland, Novak & Israel (“CNI”), an architectural firm, en tered a contract with Davison’s to design the renovation. Davison’s contracted independently with Williams Tile & Terrazzo Company (“Williams”) to install the tile. CNI designated “Virtue Summer Wheat 102” as the tile to be used, based upon past experience with the tile at other locations. Williams, in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Long v. Jim Letts Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Housing Authority v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- E. & M. Construction Co., Inc. v. BobCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Bodin v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- John Martin Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Tommy L. Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Malta Construction Co. v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.