Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 18, 1996No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This Memorandum and Order emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff the United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14,1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provisions. In the first phase of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Intern. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-CioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API