Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 13, 1997No. 88 CIV. 4486(DNE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by the United States of America against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provisions. In the first phase of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United Steelworkers of America v. SadlowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. United States v. Intern. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-CioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Ron CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API