Legal Opinion

United States v. Pascal Ballistrea

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 25, 1996No. 56, Docket 95-1578PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

The primary question on this appeal is whether a defendant can be convicted of “defrauding” an agency of the United States under the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, if he did not contact agency personnel or submit docmnents to the agency. The question arises on an appeal by Pascal Ballistrea from the September 26, 1995, judgment of the District Court for the Western District of New York (Richard J. Arcara, Judge), convicting him, after a jury trial, of five counts arising under substantive provisions of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API