Legal Opinion

Eisenschmidt v. Ader

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 7, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

Fort Thomas is a town of the sixth class, and the power of the board of trustees to construct, or cause to be constructed, improvements upon the streets, is controlled and governed by the statutes, which constitute what is ordinarily designated as the charter of towns of that class. The greater number of authorities cited by counsel in their briefs as well as the greater number of adjudications of this court upon subjects kindred to that in controversy, have very little bearing upon or relation to the issues arising in this action. Most of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zable v. Louisville Baptist Orphans' HomeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  2. Hydes v. JoyesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  3. Town of Hardinsburg v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Barry v. City of CloverportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Town of Walton v. DiersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Mara v. Town of Mt. VernonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Town of Kevil v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Town of Kevil v. NuckolsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. City of Uniontown v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Privette v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API