State v. Shackelford

RUDMAN, Justice.

William Shackelford challenges by direct appeal to this court the legality of the sentence imposed upon him by the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) after we vacated Shackelford’s original sentence imposed as a result of his conviction for robbery 1 and remanded for resentencing. Shackelford argues that the court, in ordering a consecutive sentence on his robbery conviction at resentencing, illegally altered his sentences for receiving stolen property 2 and eluding police. 3 We agree.

On October 31, 1991, William Shackelford was adjudged guilty of robbery,…