Legal Opinion

Chernin v. International Oil Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The principal defendants in these two garnishment actions sought to secure a dismissal of the garnishment proceedings on their motions for summary judgment on the ground that the complaints in the principal actions failed to state a cause of action “for damages, founded upon contract.” It is conceded by all parties that unless the principal action is one “for damages, founded upon contract” as required by sec. 267.01 (3), Stats., the instant garnishment actions cannot be maintained.

The principal defendants, as a part of their motion papers, attached as exhibits thereto, copies of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Orton v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Roberts v. Saukville Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Klade v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Wm. Marnitz Co. v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Family Finance Corp. v. SniadachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Family Finance Corp. v. SniadachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Family Finance Corp. v. SniadachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API