Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. Redd

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1932No. Nos. 23478-23479. En BancPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Two tracts of land in Franklin county, owned by an incompetent person, were assessed for the years 1922 to 1927, inclusive, by the local county assessor, and the taxes extended and entered on the rolls in the usual manner. All of the taxes levied against the two tracts were paid under protest by the landowner. Alleging excessive valuation of the lands by the local assessor, the landowner’s guardian instituted two separate actions against Franklin county for the refund of the protested taxes. One of the actions has not yet been brought to trial. The trial of the other cause resulted in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ames v. People ex rel. TempleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Harward v. St. Clair & Monroe Levee & Drainage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. State Tax Commission v. Bailey & HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Carkonen v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Yakima Amusement Co. v. Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sator v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. King County v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API