Legal Opinion
Underwood v. Buzby
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 11, 1956No. 11864PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case raises the question of whether the trial court was correct in holding that a public liability insurance carrier is required by the following terms of its policy to pay interest on the uninsured portion of a verdict from the date of entry of judgment on that verdict to the date of payment into court of the proceeds of the policy and interest thereon :1
“As respects the insurance afforded by the other terms of this policy *938under coverages A and B the company shall: * * *
“(c) pay all expenses incurred by the company, all costs taxed against the insured in any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Sampson v. Century Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Wilkerson v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1953
- Hankins v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Powell v. TA & C. TAXI CO.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
- Highway Casualty Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Dibenedetto v. Estate of DibenedettoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.