Legal Opinion
Huerta v. Flood
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1968No. 9378PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.
The petitioner, C. Lawrence Huerta, seeks from this Court a writ of prohibition against the Justice of the Peace of the West Phoenix Precinct, Maricopa County, from proceeding further in the pending criminal matter of State v. Huerta.
Petitioner, an incumbent judge of the Superior Court, Maricopa County, has been charged in six counts of violating A.R.S. § 13-1021 which reads:
Ҥ 13-1021. Prohibition; penalty
A. No public officer or public employee of the state, a state agency, or a political subdivision shall directly or indirectly command, ask, coerce, or attempt to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. WurzbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Fort v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Ex Parte CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Specter v. MoakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. VickeryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Mancuso v. TaftDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.