Legal Opinion

Moss v. WOODROW REYNOLDS AND SON TIMBER CO.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1992No. 1900980PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case between coterminous landowners involves a claim of adverse possession. We affirm.

The issue is whether the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that Edgar Moss, the defendant, satisfied the elements of adverse possession necessary to acquire title to a disputed 20-acre tract of land.

Woodrow Reynolds and Son Timber Company, Inc. ("Reynolds"), acquired, by deed, title to the disputed 20-acre parcel of land from Ellis Jordan. This property is described by deed as:

"E 1/2 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4, Section 14, Township 6 North, Range 3 West, Washington County, Alabama containing 20…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Wallace v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Bell v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Pinson v. VeachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wadkins v. MeltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Mc Dixon Fam. P'ship, Lllp v. Envision Prop., LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Shirey v. PittmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Stokes v. CottrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Wadsworth v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API