Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1978No. 56131PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

Frances and Marion Hawkins filed this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Mrs. Hawkins as a result of severe allergic reactions to a sulfa drug manufactured by Richardson-Merrell, Inc., sold by Reed Drug Company, and prescribed by Dr. Joel R. Greenberg. The action against each defendant was based solely upon the theory of negligence. This is indicated by plaintiffs’ complaint, and so recited in the trial court’s order of January 13,1977, denying Merrell’s motion to compel answers to interrogatories by the plaintiffs, the trial judge stating in the order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goolsby v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Pilkenton v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. PARKE, DAVIS & COMPANY v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Milton Inn, Inc. v. SpivaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Webb v. Sandoz Chemical Works Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jack v. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
  2. Dupree v. Keller Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Hawkins v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Presto v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API