Webb v. Sandoz Chemical Works Inc.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition set forth a cause of action, and the court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss it. See Blood Balm Co. v. Cooper, 83 Ga. 457 (10 S. E. 118).

Recovery in the present case is sought on the theory that the defendant, without disclosing its dangerous properties, was negligent in putting on the market the poisonous medication known as “Cafergone,” some of which was taken by the wife of the plaintiff with damaging results. It is not contended, or shown by the evidence, that the product was adulterated or otherwise than what it was…