Legal Opinion
Chlystek v. Kane
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-545PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, District Judge.
The male plaintiff in this ease like “The Thane of Fife had a wife: Where is she now?” 1 Apparently she is alive and well, whether living in Paris or elsewhere, and has not been done to death by the lawless violence of a Macbeth. It is because she lives that this litigation lives also.
It seems that the matrimonial bond between said wife and male plaintiff was severed at her instance on October 31,1944, at 229 October Term 1944 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, on the grounds of adultery between male plaintiff and female plaintiff.
Fo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Helen Chlystek v. Joseph Califano, Individually and in His Capacity as the Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Pine Township Citizens' Ass'n v. ArnoldDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978