Legal Opinion

Helen Chlystek v. Joseph Califano, Individually and in His Capacity as the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 7, 1979No. 78-2453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

Helen Chlystek appeals from the judgment of the district court, affirming the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration (SSA), which denied her widow’s benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433 (1976) (Subchapter II — Federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Benefits). The district court held that under Pennsylvania law, the claimant was not legally married to Adam Chlystek, the deceased wage earner, at the time of his death and therefore is not entitled to receive widow’s benefits. We reverse.

I

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Dora Coy, of the Estate of Frank M. Coy, Deceased v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. Estate of StullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peffley-Warner v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Rithie Parker v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API