Legal Opinion

Coles v. Mozley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1918No. 552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Equitable petition. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. July 7, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “The consideration of a deed may always be inquired into when the principles of justice require it.” Civil Code, § 4179; Thrower v. Baker, 144 Ga. 372 (87 S. E. 301); Coldwell Co. v. Cowart, 138 Ga. 233 (75 S. E. 425), and cit.

2. It follows that where A conveys land to B by deed reciting a money consideration, in a suit brought by A’s trustee in bankruptcy against B’s executors, alleging that the consideration was as expressed in the deed, and that only part thereof had been paid, and seeking to subject the land specified in the deed to the alleged balance due, it may be explained, as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coldwell Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WillbanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Thrower v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Riverside Milling & Power Co. v. Bank of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newsom v. Reynolds Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API