Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Reynolds Chevrolet Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1931No. 21028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. A suit brought by petition as “the petition of the Reynolds Chevrolet Company, a trade name used by W. E. Marshall,” was manifestly intended as a suit by such individual in his trade name, and as to the party plaintiff was good in substance and not subject to general demurrer upon the ground that it did not appear to have been brought in the name of any person as plaintiff. See Bremen Foundry & Machine Works v. McLendon, 19 Ga. App. 650 (91 S. E. 1049) ; Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Farkas, 27 Ga. App. 153 (107 S. E. 610), in which cases the principle underlying such cases as Western &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Eslinger v. HerndonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Rheney v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Becker v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Thrower v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samples v. Georgia Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. McCall v. KlirosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. William Fitzgerald Milk Products Corp. v. Kimbro Service Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Alropa Corporation v. PomeranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API