Legal Opinion

In Re State for a Writ of Mandamus

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 27, 1991PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court has before it a petition that seeks to invoke its original jurisdiction for the purpose of issuing an extraordinary writ. Del.Const. Art. IV, Sec. 11; Supr. Ct.R. 43. The petition was filed by the State of Delaware and requests that this Court issue a writ of mandamus to the Superior Court. The underlying matter that gave rise to the present proceedings is a trial, which is currently in progress, in State of Delaware v. James E. Harris, Jr., (“Harris”) Cr.A. Nos. IN90-08-0497 and 0498.

Two days ago, on September 25, 1991 a jury convicted Harris of Murder in the First Degree. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. South Carolina v. GathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. In Re Bordley's Petition for Writ of MandamusSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MuhammadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Cargle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. MeansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API