Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 1985No. 55, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The question presented in this criminal case is whether, after a jury informs the trial judge that it is deadlocked and discloses the numerical majority-minority division, it is erroneous as a matter of law for the trial judge to give an Allen -type charge in the form recommended by the American Bar Association (ABA).

The underlying facts, taken largely from the parties’ agreed statement of facts pursuant to Maryland Rule 828 g, are as follows. Louis Garland Mayfield was indicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for attempted armed robbery and related offenses,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. Burl A. Sawyers, Vincent J. Johnkoski, Bonn Brown, Alfred W. SchroathCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Lee v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Nash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API