Nash v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*57HARRELL, J.
In a trial court judge’s management of a trial, few circumstances come fraught with as much peril as the receipt of a note from a deliberating jury. Whether to deal with it? How to deal with it? Some jury notes contain innocuous questions or statements to which a presiding judge may respond with ease. Other notes may pose, however, more problematic questions or statements that place a judge between a modern Scylla and Charybdis. Although the judge may want to be helpful in responding to the jury, he or she must take care not to be coercive or suggestive of an outcome. A quick…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- People v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Elsberry v. Stanley Martin CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Armacost v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- State of West Virginia v. Donald DunnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.