Legal Opinion

McPhee v. Tufty

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2001No. 20000047PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] AMCO Insurance Company (“AMCO”) appealed from an amended judgment awarding Lory L. McPhee and Roy McPhee, individually and as the surviving parents of Sandra A. McPhee, $100,000 from the proceeds of an automobile liability insurance policy AMCO issued to Curtis and Debra Tufty. We conclude the trial court erred in ruling the AMCO insurance policy provided coverage under the circumstances, and we reverse.

I

[¶ 2] In 1994, Curtis and Debra Tufty’s teenage son, Christopher Tufty, lived in Gwinner with his parents and brother and sister, Travis and Amanda Tufty. In…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Norgaard v. Nodak Mutual Insurance CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Wangler v. LerolNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Malchose v. KalfellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Syed Shah v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API