Legal Opinion
Bombardier Corp. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 1, 2003No. 02-7125PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation brought this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss. Amtrak attempts to invoke Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 16 (2000), which permits interlocutory appeal in enumerated cases. Because we conclude that this appeal does not fall within the parameters of the limited grant of jurisdiction under Section 16, we dismiss the appeal.
Background
In May 1996 appellant, National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Fields, Beverly v. Off Eddie JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.