Legal Opinion
McFarland v. Union Central Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 12, 1995No. 1:95-cv-00122PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JORDAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the court for consideration of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment [doc. 10], and the plaintiffs motion to dismiss [doe. 17], which should more properly be considered as a motion to remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e).
The court has considered the exhibits submitted by the defendant in support of its motion for summary judgment, as well as the affidavit, attached to the motion, of Kim Sterwerf, a senior examiner in the defendant’s group service and claims division. The court has also considered the defendant’s brief…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- International Resources, Inc. Larry E. Smith v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plymouth & Brockton Street Railway Co. v. LeylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Hill v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004