Thomas Hamilton Pharmacy, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Nationwide) met its initial burden of establishing that the plaintiff commenced this action after expiration of the two-year limitations period contained in the subject insurance policy (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 967-968 [1988]; Halim v State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 31 AD3d 710 [2006]; Schachter v Royal Ins. Co. of Am., 21 AD3d 1024 [2005]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the action was governed by the six-year statute of limitations set forth in CPLR…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Schachter v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Culinary Institute of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Saxena v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 80-02 Leasehold, LLC v. CM Realty Holdings Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014