Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Sullivan
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1912No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Monroe; O’Mealey, J. Bill by Leonora Sullivan against Daniel F. Sullivan for divorce. From a decree for complainant, for insufficient alimony, she appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
Complainant filed a bill of complaint praying for an absolute divorce, the custody of two minor children, and alimony for the support of herself and the children. From a decree granting an absolute divorce, the care of two of the minor children, and permanent alimony in the sum of $500, complainant appeals because of the insufficiency of the alimony awarded her. The defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill. He served notice of an appeal, but has not prosecuted his appeal.
The material parts of the decree read as follows:
“ (1) That the cross-bill of the defendant be dismissed.
“…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ferguson v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Sullivan v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Helvering v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Thomas v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925