Legal Opinion

Renard v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 7, 1984No. 83-1798PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

This is an action for libel, conspiracy to libel, malicious injury to property rights and conspiracy to maliciously injure property rights against all of the defendants, and for fraud and conspiracy to defraud against defendants Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., CBS Inc., Harry Porterfield and James Hatfield. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint, finding that plaintiff had failed to state a cause of action under section 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615). Plaintiff appeals.

The instant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Colson v. StiegIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Richardson v. DunbarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Bruck v. CincottaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. American Intional Hospital v. Chicago Tribune Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. American Int'l Hosp. v. Chicago Tribune Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Heerey v. BerkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Marczak v. Drexel National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API