Legal Opinion
Marczak v. Drexel National Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 18, 1989No. 1-88-0472PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE BILANDIC
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Genevieve Marczak, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her first amended complaint and the denial of her motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. She argues that the complaint sufficiently alleged defamation and that she was not precluded from recovery for unjust dismissal and intentional interference with a business relationship by the National Bank Act of 1864. 12 U.S.C. §24 (1982).
Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was filed against Drexel National Bank (hereinafter the Bank) and John Colgan, Russ…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- John v. Tribune CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Catalano v. PechousIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- George A. Fuller Co., a Division of Northrop Corporation v. Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Raymond R. Wiskotoni v. Michigan National Bank-WestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anderson v. Vanden DorpelIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Rambo v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Barakat v. MatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Bowe v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.