Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mileff v. Mifflin Township

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-1465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellants argue that Mileff failed to apply for reemployment within ninety days of his discharge from active duty and, consequently, was not entitled to reemployment. As to the limited writ requiring appellants to hold a hearing, appellants maintain that, having failed to apply timely for reemployment, Mileff no longer was a permanent employee entitled to a hearing.

R.C. 5903.02 requires a public employer to grant a leave of absence to a public employee who is inducted or otherwise enters military duty. R.C. 5903.03 states:

“A public employee who leaves a position, * * * whether voluntarily or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Coffy v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pasquine v. Liberty Township Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API