Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided November 20, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00056Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION SCOTT A. HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-56-DJH-RSE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al., Defendants. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Following the 2017 tragic mass shooting in Las Vegas, when a shooter armed with bump- stock devices opened fire on an outdoor concert, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) revisited its classification of bump-stock devices under federal firearm laws. See Bump-Stock-Type Devices, 83 Fed. Reg. 66,514, 66,516 (Dec. 26,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API