Amir Fatir v. Casey Phelps et al.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AMIR FATIR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 18-1549-CFC-EGT ) CASEY PHELPS et al., ) ) Defendants. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Presently before the Court is the motion of Defendants Casey Phelps and Jason Rash (“State Defendants”) for summary judgment. (D.I. 236). Plaintiff appears pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (D.I. 4). For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that State Defendants’ motion be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Amir Fatir (“Plaintiff”), a prolific pro se litigant, is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.