Legal Opinion

Ross v. Flynn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1920No. Civ. No. 3219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in its own favor, seeking a review of an order of the lower court striking its amended complaint from the files, and directing the entry of judgment as prayed for in the original complaint.

[1] The plaintiff first filed a complaint in claim and delivery and the defendants answered separately. Thereafter the plaintiff gave notice of motion for permission to file an amended complaint changing its cause of action to one in conversion, and praying for damages therefor. On the hearing the court, over the objection of the defendants, granted the motion.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Romero v. RomeroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
  2. Menzies v. Geophysical Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Miranda v. LópezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
  4. Taboada Bosch v. DragoniSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  5. Barceló v. Sucrs. de FernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API