Legal Opinion

State v. O'Connell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 29, 1993No. 69,165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Royse, J.:

Harvey O’Connell appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court and the denial of his motion to modify sentence.

O’Connell pled no contest to three counts of burglary, a class D felony. He waived his rights to a presentence investigation, and the court agreed to impose sentence immediately after accepting the plea. Pursuant to a plea agreement, O’Connell requested and the State recommended a sentence of 3 to 10 years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. The plea agreement did not address the sentencing presumptions found in K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-4606a and K.S.A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. State v. FishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API