Legal Opinion

State v. Fish

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 16, 1993No. 68,172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a plea agreement sentencing case. Stuart Fish, the defendant, received the sentence he bargained for. The single issue is whether the trial court erred in denying a motion for sentence modification.

Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 22-3601(b)(l) (defendant convicted of a class A felony or received a maximum sentence of life imprisonment).

The standard of review for trial court sentencing is abuse of discretion. A sentence imposed within the statutory guidelines will not be disturbed on appeal if it is within the trial court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MareskaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. State v. O'ConnellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. GambrelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API