Martin v. Hieken
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs seek to recover damages because of defendant’s alleged breach of his duty as plaintiffs’ real estate agent. The action was initiated in the Magistrate Court of the City of St. Louis, where judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. Upon trial de novo in the circuit court, without a jury, plaintiffs obtained a judgment for $566.82, and defendant appealed.
The essential facts are these: Defendant, a real estate broker, in the spring of 1955, was employed by Mr. and Mrs. L. R. Mc-Cord to sell their resort property, called the Hi Ho Hideout, situated on the Lake…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dittmeier v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Acy v. Inland Security CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cline v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Politte v. WallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Windsor v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roth v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Leuzinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Groh v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Proctor v. HoldenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Travagliante v. JW Wood Realty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.