Goldberg v. Drake
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Assumpsit by Samuel T. Goldberg against Soledad Drake on a contract for the sale of certain land. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract. The written agreement between the parties was in words and figures following:
‘ ‘ Memorandum of agreement made this 29th day of April, A. D. 1904, between Samuel T. Goldberg, party of the first part, and Soledad Drake, party of the second part, in the manner following: The said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of $25.00 to him duly paid upon the signing of this agreement, hereby agrees to sell unto the said party of the second part all that certain piece or parcel of land situate in the city of Kalamazoo,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Ludwig v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1926