Legal Opinion

Kostal v. Davis

Amherst County Circuit Court

Decided August 26, 2003No. Case No. CL02005724Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge J. Michael Gamble

I am writing this letter to rule upon the motion in limine filed by the defendants. At this time, I will not sustain the motion in limine. The damage issues must be addressed at trial.

The plaintiffs seek damages for the loss of their timber, the loss in value of their real estate, and clean-up costs for their land.

Where merchantable timber is injured or destroyed, the measure of damages is the difference between the market value of the timber immediately before the injury and its market value immediately after the injury. Virginian Ry. v. Hurt, 112 Va. 622, 627, 72…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Advanced Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. PRC Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Cooper v. HornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Honaker Lumber Co. v. KiserSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Virginian Railway Co. v. HurtSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API