Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1933PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This is an action to recover compensation for damages occasioned by a fire charged against the railway company. There was a verdict for the sum of $60,000, which was reduced by the trial court to $42,500.

We shall use the terms plaintiff and defendant as they were there used.

The defendant is a trunk line railway, with double straight away tracks, running from Norfolk to Suffolk and beyond. Between these two cities is Dismal Swamp. That, as its name indicates, is a swamp. It is of vast extent, and stretches from Virginia into North Carolina. Originally it was covered by valuable forests, but…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Green v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. McMahon v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HeathSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Alvey v. ButchkavitzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. Cummer-Graham Co. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Barry v. TylerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Younger v. Appalachian Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  5. C. & O. RY. CO. v. SeaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API