Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
This is an action to recover compensation for damages occasioned by a fire charged against the railway company. There was a verdict for the sum of $60,000, which was reduced by the trial court to $42,500.
We shall use the terms plaintiff and defendant as they were there used.
The defendant is a trunk line railway, with double straight away tracks, running from Norfolk to Suffolk and beyond. Between these two cities is Dismal Swamp. That, as its name indicates, is a swamp. It is of vast extent, and stretches from Virginia into North Carolina. Originally it was covered by valuable forests, but…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Green v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- McMahon v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HeathSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alvey v. ButchkavitzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Cummer-Graham Co. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Barry v. TylerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Younger v. Appalachian Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- C. & O. RY. CO. v. SeaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.