Legal Opinion

Miller v. Building Service Maintenance & Miscellaneous Employees Union Local 400

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Isidor Wasservogel, Spec. Ref.

Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from removing him as secretary-treasurer and as business agent of the defendant union.

On or about September 27, 1959, plaintiff was duly elected as secretary-treasurer of the defendant union (hereinafter referred to as “ Union ”). Since that date, and until the dispute here involved, plaintiff has acted as such officer and as a business agent of the Union. On November 10,1960, the defendant Schwarz, as president of the Union, dismissed plaintiff as business agent. Subsequently, on November 16, 1960, after plaintiff refused to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Polin v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Havens v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Rutstein v. RutsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Dusing v. NuzzoNew York Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daele v. VinciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  2. Miller v. Building Service MaintenanceNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API